It is said that it is impossible to imagine the fourth dimension with our
three-dimensional
brains. None-the-less it is quite possible to comprehend some of
the basic principals to the
theory of hyper-dimensions. On June 10 1854 George Bernard Riemann
began to explain
to the world the possibility of higher dimensions and do to the
work he has done others
have been able to use his theories and mathematical formulas to
further understand the
complexities of reality.
What is the fourth dimension?
After the existence of the fourth dimension has been recognized
how can one imagine the
spaces occupied by the fourth dimension. Some have described it
as light others sound. One
example of physical description deals with the change from two
to three dimensions.
Powers from Beyond
With the ability to pass into the fourth dimension come powers
which could be described as
magic. One could simply pass through solid matter, or even just
shift from one location to
another instantaneously. It's a simple matter of traveling through
the fourth dimension
rather than the other three. Buddhists are said to have supernatural
powers. With a
knowledge of how to manipulate the fourth dimension (through mediation
and
enlightenment) such powers become simple to understand.
Time as the Fourth Dimension
"Time as the fourth dimension" has been around since the theory of relativity
by Einstein and his use of this variable in describing space. For us "time"
seems to transcend the standard geometric of our three dimensional plane
and become itself another dimension. Time therefore seems to have a perplexing
significance in its relation to the fourth dimension.
The first dimension is linear,
The second dimension is perpendicular
The third dimension is square.
The fourth dimension is the one which you cannot touch.
The fourth dimension is the one which you cannot reach.
The fourth dimension is the one which you cannot understand.
"Generally, the fourth dimension is used as the synonym
of the mysterious, miraculous, supernatural, incomprehensible, and fundamentally
unknowable; as a kind of general definition of the super-physical worldly
(Even in the scientific field, there's no precise and controllable definition
of the fourth dimension).
Fourth Dimension
From 1890 to the mid-1920s, both scientific and popular literature was
filled with articles by people attempting to show ways to access the mindset
of fourth dimensional consciousness (4D). These appeared both as intense
mathematical "proofs" and simplified "poofs," but the goal was the same:
OPEN YOUR MIND TO A HIGHER ORDER OF CONSCIOUSNESS,
then come back "down to earth" and express this understanding in a tangible
way in 3D. The principal means of realizing this for most people was "organic."
In effect, the most dominant form of power in our lives, was used to focus
our attentions away from inner states of consciousness. Instead, in the
name of "scientific" progress, an obsession with external delineations
like straight-lined geometric forms (boxes, boxes everywhere) was foisted
forward as some kind of salvation against a supposed delusion. All of this
went hand in hand with (and was an organic expression of) the belief that
the material world was the highest form of "reality" or consciousness.
Louis Sullivan died of alcoholism, in poverty, in a cheap Chicago hotel,
his "organic" understanding of the Great Life left for dead, by and large.What
was actually left behind was the doorway to 4D consciousness. Popular culture
has thus succeeded in establishing 4D consciousness where the scientific
establishment has not. Science as a viewpoint is actually on the decline
in the larger population, which is seeking something that is not openly
apparent in the physical paradigm of "scientific thinking." In short,
people are beginning to look for spiritual values--and as Louis Sullivan
and those of his time spent their lives trying to point out, that spiritual
quest exists in 4D, because the 4D continuum IS the realm of the spiritual.
This has, in its own terms, as objective and orderly an existence as the
3D material plane.Bottomline: Spirit--whatever it is--has a genuine existence
that is not measurable in a 3D context. Yet there is undeniably a continuous
presence in human thought and feeling about the "Great Life." It is the
metaphor of myth, archetype, and all the other cultural permutations across
human existence that have tried to reference something that is expressed
materially, but whose origin and continuation
refers to a reality whose material forms are only crystallizations.
In this 4D aspect,as some have suggested, the ETs are emanations of ourselves,
and vice versa. On a 3D level, however, this plain vanilla understanding
may find some nasty and very dislikable expressions. In talking about the
ETs--whether as physical entities or as "channeled" mentations-- it is
essential to distinguish the scale on which the discussion is based. There
are only two grades: relative, and absolute. Relative expressions are always
3D. Absolute expressions are always 4D. This is the barrier in consciousness
that is referred to as "the speed of light." The attainment of the ET technology
is the ability to move into and out of the 4D continuum and still retain
a relationship to their relative 3D existence. They do "go faster than
the speed of light," but that must be understood as passing from a relative
to an absolute frame. In the 4D frame "the speed of light" has the same
"real" existence as an imaginary number. Thus, this "science" that
is seeking to measure and catalog and inventory and otherwise delimit the
ET craft is seeking to explain a 4D phenomenon in a 3D context. It can't
be done, and so therefore the "scientific conclusion" is that such things
do not exist.This rejection is based on a liking for order and sequence
that is summarized as linear systemization. Linear thinking is based on
a desire for a shared predictability that exists--in those terms--only
in the physical world. 4D awareness makes that the same kind of domain
that Einstein made of Newton's laws.
Once you have gained a mental foothold in 4D,
the seed is sewn for the realization of the continuum of the Great Life.Event
B can happen before event A because "A" and "B" are markers of a linear
sequence system. An ET can meet you many times, and you will have no memory
of it in 3D "consciousness" whereas you will see the "relationship" clearly
in 4D. The continuum is not a concept, it is a higher state of consciousness
to which concepts can only point the way. One of the things that happens
when you actually get a continuous realization of the 4D continuum is
"omniscient" comprehension. Of course, the reliability of this
"omniscience" is in direct proportion to the clarity of your mind. There
are many "obscurations," as the Buddhist masters call them,
"defilements," and "impurities." These are all related to the ego.
If you've ever sat in a barber's chair where both walls in front and behind
were mirrors, you have a metaphor of the ego. Reflections within reflections
within reflections, ad infinitum. This "false" reflection is in actuality
only a series of images that pass through your mind. You have learned to
grasp these, collect them (memory), and they have, through the process
of your education and experience, become a means of self-identification.
The mechanism of projecting this identification produces the phenomenon
called the ego. The ego stands directly in the way of 4D omniscience.
The raw nature of mind is clear light. Not white light, not rose colored
lenses, not golden auras, but simply clear light. And there is nothing
in form, shape, pattern, depth, or point. This raw state is the foundation
of being. Our 3D physical world--all the phenomena given expression by
the structures of the physical senses, the body as a whole--are like sitting
in the barber's chair. Each instance of being is one of the images reflected
in the mirror. All are discrete quanta (continuums) with their own inherent
boundaries of existence. The ego decides which is "real," and which is
"imag-inary," or "unreal". The mind exists as a 4D continuum of consciousness
that enfolds all these "existences," and the ego is a filter in the stream.
The ego is a prioritizer of the sensual imagery that develops from contact
with the five senses. It is a seemingly arbitrary discriminator in most
people, but in fact the ego collects through a structured mechanism and
therefore is inherently (organically or "reflexively") structured itself.
In some individuals, often called shamans, psychics, sensitives, oracles,
dreamers, etc., there exists a psychological balance that is tilted more
toward the 4D mind than the 3D sensual world. Still, however, there is
present the structural predispositions of the ego.
When 4D cognizers turn their attention to the
inner continuum, the awareness they attain is filtered through their egos.
This mechanism of projection/ identification dresses the 4D consciousness
out of the available wardrobe of 3D imagery. This imagery is then made
"concrete" when rendered in a linear symbol systems such as language. It
thus acquires a "patina" of solidity in 3D terms that the originating energy
or impulse did not have In many forms of psychisms over the millenia of
which we have record, this projection is determined by the dominant cultural
paradigm. Thus, an experience of this pure light--processed through an
ego that is rooted in a human body with earthly concerns--can appear as
the Virgin Mary, the bodhisattva Avalokiteshvara, and so on. These projections
make the experience understandable and communicable from the inner state
to the outer one.
This mechanism, which I have described only
simply, is the basis for "channeling" ETs and at the level of the most
common denominator is what Jung called "archetypes." The archetye is what
all humans will experience, and the myth is the local form in a specific
time and place. Joseph Campbell produced a rich synthesis of these many
forms to indicate what we all share in common as humans.
On one level, the "entities" are merely reflections in the barber's
mirror. In essence, they are the play of raw mind, given form by virtue
of an ego's predelictions. Such absolute description precludes your own
inherent existence, as the Buddhists have declared for millenia. On the
other hand, if you wish to consider yourself as real, then relatively speaking
so are these other "entities." In actuality, of course, your own ego and
the "information" of the entities is a single reflexive process brought
about by obscuration of the clear light that is your true being asmind.
That's why there is such an emphasis in channeled material about the "Light."
Channeled ET personalities go on about manifold dimensions, human destinies,
and so forth, but the conversation almost always takes place in warm fuzzy
generalities. Mythically, this was poetically expressed in popular film
when Yoda says to Luke Skywalker, "Beings of light are we, not this crude
body." Channeled ETs have exactly as much "real" existence as Yoda and
Luke. They are impressions of the mind based on a deeper underlying reality
that cannot be expressed directly in 3D mentation.
In essence, we are all One. One
big undifferentiated mind of clear light. In places, this mind takes form
as humans, in other places as animals, in other places as discarnate entities
(psychological forms), and in an infinitude of other expressions. This
realization, which is different from merely entertaining the mentation,
is the basis for vegetarianism. To kill an animal and eat its flesh is
to kill your own being and eat your own body. The observation that life
feeds on life does not exclude the fact that this is a harsh reality to
live in. ETs are about getting out. 4D consciousness points all this
out as clearly as is your mind free of egoic obscuration, defilement, and
impurities.
Clairvoyance means simply sight at a distance.
Remote viewing is one form of clairvoyance, and this was demonstrated in
various experiments during the Apollo era, as well as being on ongoing
(but not loudly overt) trials on the shuttle from time to time. Clairvoyance
is a function of 4D consciousness. It is a basic characteristic of ET mentality.
All humans are, to one degree or another, clairvoyant; this is one legacy
of our adaptation as a species by the ETs. ET craft are navigated by a
technologically augmented form of clairvoyant function. Here is a nexus,
a locus, a synthesis point between 4D reality and the 3D human perception
of what are only the edges of that world.
In fact, if you are seeing "edges" at all, you are not using your
4D faculties. The principal
characteristic of clairvoyant function, expressed in a 3D context,
is that you are seeing things "from
the inside out." This point is made frequently in the older Theosophical
writings, particularly by
Charles Leadbeater (for whom I have no great affinity).
When you actually perceive (as opposed to mentally
constructing an Escher image) this "inside out" quality, a fresher description
might be that you are looking at both the outside and the inside at the
same time. In contemporary parlance, the watcher and the watched are the
same "thing." Since this experience is occurring in an "inner space," several
important qualities are revealed.
First, you are no longer in a subject/object relationship.
Instead, you are directly perceiving a
process. In 4-D terms, you are encompassing the full movement of
an unfolding state of existence.
You are, colloquially, in two places at the same time, yet in actuality
you are neither. This understanding is the basis for ET propulsion and
materialization/ dematerialization systems.
Second, in clairvoyance there is no "physical
distance" to be overcome. 4D consciousness functionsoutside of the 3D concept
of space/time. The mind is equally present in all circumstances.
Awareness is a matter of focus. Clairvoyance is a matter of conscious
focus. There are many training practices that have been handed down through
the centuries, one teacher personally to another, to induce deeper awareness
of this faculty. All are directed toward attaining the unimpeded awareness
of the clear light of 4D mind; clairvoyance and other "powers" are simply
results of this effort. Many teachers regard them as obstacles to be disregarded.
The Tibetan Buddhist lineages are strongest in this regard, but there are
also Sufi, Jain, and many other techniques for this development.
Third, in transcending subject/object relationships
you become aware of potential as an active force. All outcomes exist in
discrete states, but the mind, in 4D, navigates through these channels
to find a "coincidence" or higher probability. This is a very complex and
highly subtle quality that must be considered, but cannot be fully articulated
here. Just be aware that manifold dimensionality is also an aspect to 4D
consciousness. The practical result of this is that many different outcomes
arise from the same cause, and it is this point that affects clairvoyant
results. However, as observed earlier, there are no "edges," "lines,"
or "points." There is only a slight differentiation in the mind between
movements that are occuring both universally (manifold dimensions) and
simultaneously (we are outside "time"). This effect *IS* transparency.
Once the hard core physicists out there start looking at this, they will
be pleased to see that their empiricism is not precluded, it simply has
a new domain in which to discover expression. The "tool" for this research
is clairvoyance. That's not an original observation.
Four-Dimensional Space
There is nothing more indefinite,
and at the same time more real, than that which we
indicate when we speak of the "higher."
In our social life we see it evidenced in a
greater complexity of relations. But this
complexity is not all. There is, at the same time,
a contact with, an apprehension of, something
more fundamental, more real.
With the greater development of man there comes
a consciousness of something more
than all the forms in which it shows itself.
There is a readiness to give up all the visible
and tangible for the sake of those principles
and values of which the visible and tangible
are the representation. The physical life
of civilized man and of a mere savage are
practically the same, but the civilized
man has discovered a depth in his existence,
which makes him feel that that which appears
all to the savage is a mere externality and
appurtenage to his true being.
Now, this higher--how shall we apprehend it?
It is generally embraced by our religious
faculties, by our idealizing tendency.
But the higher existence has two sides. It has a
being as well as qualities. And in trying
to realize it through our emotions we are always
taking the subjective view. Our attention
is always fixed on what we feel, what we
think. Is there any way of apprehending
the higher after the purely objective method of
a natural science? I think that there
is.
Plato, in a wonderful allegory, speaks of some
men living in such a condition that they
were practically reduced to be the denizens
of a shadow world. They were chained,
and perceived but the shadows of themselves
and all real objects projected on a wall,
towards which their faces were turned.
All movements to them were but movements on
the surface, all shapes but the shapes
of outlines with no substantiality.
Plato uses this illustration to portray the
relation between true being and the illusions of
the sense world. He says that just as
a man liberated from his chains could learn and
discover that the world was solid and
real, and could go back and tell his bound
companions of this greater higher reality,
so the philosopher who has been liberated,
who has gone into the thought of the ideal
world, into the world of ideas greater and
more real than the things of sense, can
come and tell his fellow men of that which is
more true than the visible sun--more noble
than Athens, the visible state.
Now, I take Plato's suggestion; but literally,
not metaphorically. He imagines a world
which is lower than this world, in that
shadow figures and shadow motions are its
constituents; and to it he contrasts the
real world. As the real world is to this shadow
world, so is the higher world to our world.
I accept his analogy. As our world in three
dimensions is to a shadow or plane world,
so is the higher world to our
three-dimensional world. That is, the
higher world is four-dimensional; the higher being
is, so far as its existence is concerned
apart from its qualities, to be sought through the
conception of an actual existence spatially
higher than that which we realize with our
senses.
Here you will observe I necessarily leave out
all that gives its charm and interest to
Plato's writings. All those conceptions
of the beautiful and good which live immortally in
his pages.
All that I keep from his great storehouse of wealth
is this one thing simply--a world
spatially higher than this world, a world
which can only be approached through the
stocks and stones of it, a world which
must be apprehended laboriously, patiently,
through the material things of it, the
shapes, the movements, the figures of it.
We must learn to realize the shapes of objects
in this world of the higher man; we must
become familiar with the movements that
objects make in his world, so that we can
learn something about his daily experience,
his thoughts of material objects, his
machinery.
The means for the prosecution of this enquiry
are given in the conception of space itself.
It often happens that that which we consider
to be unique and unrelated gives us, within
itself, those relations by means of which
we are able to see it as related to others,
determining and determined by them.
Thus, on the earth is given that phenomenon
of weight by means of which Newton
brought the earth into its true relation
to the sun and other planets. Our terrestrial globe
was determined in regard to other bodies
of the solar system by means of a relation
which subsisted on the earth itself.
And so space itself bears within it relations
of which we can determine it as related to
other space. For within space are given
the conceptions of point and line, line and
plane, which really involve the relation
of space to a higher space.
Where one segment of a straight line leaves
off and another begins is a point, and the
straight line itself can be generated
by the motion of the point.
One portion of a plane is bounded from another
by a straight line, and the plane itself
can be generated by the straight line
moving in a direction not contained in itself.
Again, two portions of solid space are limited
with regard to each other by a plane; and
the plane, moving in a direction not contained
in itself, can generate solid space.
Thus, going on, we may say that space is that
which limits two portions of higher space
from each other, and that our space will
generate the higher space by moving in a
direction not contained in itself.
Limitations of Our Existence
At the present time our actions are largely
influenced by our theories. We have
abandoned the simple and instinctive mode
of life of the earlier civilizations for one
regulated by the assumptions of our knowledge
and supplemented by all the devices of
intelligence. In such a state it is possible
to conceive that a danger may arise, not only
from a want of knowledge and practical
skill, but even from the very presence and
possession of them in any one department,
if there is a lack of information in other
departments. If, for instance, with our
present knowledge of physical laws and
mechanical skill, we were to build houses
without regard to the conditions laid down by
physiology, we should probably--to suit
an apparent convenience--make them
perfectly draught-tight, and the best-constructed
mansions would be full of suffocating
chambers. The knowledge of the construction
of the body and the conditions of its
health prevent it from suffering injury
by the development of our powers over nature.
In no dissimilar way the mental balance
is saved from the dangers attending an attention
concentrated on the laws of mechanical
science by a just consideration of the
constitution of the knowing faculty, and
the conditions of knowledge. Whatever pursuit
we are engaged in, we are acting consciously
or unconsciously upon some theory,
some view of things. And when the limits
of daily routine are continually narrowed by
the ever-increasing complication of our
civilization, it becomes doubly important that
not one only but every kind of thought
should be shared in.
There are two ways of passing beyond the domain
of practical certainty, and of looking
into the vast range of possibility. One
is by asking, "What is knowledge? What
constitutes experience?" If we adopt this
course we are plunged into a sea of
speculation. Were it not that the highest
faculties of the mind find therein so ample a
range, we should return to the solid ground
of facts, with simply a feeling of relief at
escaping from so great a confusion and
contradictoriness.
The other path which leads us beyond the horizon
of actual experience is that of
questioning whatever seems arbitrary and
irrationally limited in the domain of
knowledge. Such a questioning has often
been successfully applied in the search for
new facts. For a long time four gases
were considered incapable of being reduced to
the liquid state. It is but lately that
a physicist has succeeded in showing that there is no
such arbitrary distinction among gases.
Recently again the question has been raised, "Is
there not a fourth state of matter?" Solid,
liquid, and gaseous states are known. Mr.
Crookes attempts to demonstrate the existence
of a state differing from all of these. It is
the object of these pages to show that,
by supposing away certain limitations of the
fundamental conditions of existence as
we know it, a state of being can be conceived
with powers far transcending our own.
When this is made clear it will not be out of
place to investigate what relations would
subsist between our mode of existence and
that which will be seen to be a possible
one.
In the first place, what is the limitation that
we must suppose away?
An observer standing
in the corner of a room has three directions naturally marked out
for him; one is upwards along the line
of meeting of the two walls; another is forwards
where the floor meets one of the walls;
a third is sideways where the floor meets the
other wall. He can proceed to any part
of the floor of the room by moving first the right
distance along one wall, and then by turning
at right angles and walking parallel to the
other wall. He walks in this case first
of all in the direction of one of the straight lines
that meet in the corner of the floor,
afterwards in the direction of the other. By going
more or less in one direction or the other,
he can reach any point on the floor, and any
movement, however circuitous, can be resolved
into simple movements in these two
directions.
But by moving in these two directions he is
unable to raise himself in the room. If he
wished to touch a point in the ceiling,
he would have to move in the direction of the line
in which the two walls meet. There are
three directions then, each at right angles to
both the other, and entirely independent
of one another. By moving in these three
directions or combinations of them, it
is possible to arrive at any point in a room. And if
we suppose the straight lines which meet
in the corner of the room to be prolonged
indefinitely, it would be possible by
moving in the direction of those three lines, to arrive
at any point in space. Thus in space there
are three independent directions, and only
three; every other direction is compounded
of these three. The question that comes
before us then is this. "Why should there
be three and only three directions?" Space, as
we know it, is subject to a limitation.
In order to obtain an adequate conception of
what this limitation is, it is necessary to
first imagine beings existing in a space
more limited than that in which we move. Thus
we may conceive a being who has been throughout
all the range of his experience
confined to a single straight line. Such
a being would know what it was to move to and
fro, but no more. The whole of space would
be to him but the extension in both
directions of the straight line to an
infinite distance. It is evident that two such creatures
could never pass one another. We can conceive
their coming out of the straight line and
entering it again, but they having moved
always in one straight line, would have no
conception of any other direction of motion
by which such a result could be effected.
The only shape which could exist in a
one-dimensional existence of this kind would be
a finite straight line. There would be
no difference in the shapes of figures; all that could
exist would simply be longer or shorter
straight lines.
Again, to go a step higher in the domain of
a conceivable existence. Suppose a being
confined to a plane superficies, and throughout
all the range of its experience never to
have moved up or down, but simply to have
kept to this one plane. Suppose, that is,
some figure, such as a circle or rectangle,
to be endowed with the power of perception;
such a being if it moves in the plane
superficies in which it is drawn, will move in a
multitude of directions; but, however
varied they may seem to be, these directions will
all be compounded of two, at right angles
to each other. By no movement so long as
the plane superficies remains perfectly
horizontal, will this being move in the direction
we call up and down. And it is important
to notice that the plane would be different to a
creature confined to it, from what it
is to us. We think of a plane habitually as having an
upper and a lower side, because it is
only by the contact of solids that we realize a
plane. But a creature which had been confined
to a plane during its whole existence
would have no idea of there being two
sides to the plane he lived in. In a plane there is
simply length and breadth. If a creature
in it be supposed to know of an up or down he
must already have gone out of the plane.
Is it possible, then, that a creature so circumstanced
would arrive at the notion of there
being an up and down, a direction different
from those to which he had been
accustomed, and having nothing in common
with them? Obviously nothing in the
creature's circumstances would tell him
of it. It could only be by a process of reasoning
on his part that he could arrive at such
a conception. If he were to imagine a being
confined to a single straight line, he
might realize that he himself could move in two
directions, while the creature in a straight
line could only move in one. Having made this
reflection he might ask, "But why is the
number of directions limited to two? Why
should there not be three?"
A creature (if such existed), which moves in
a plane would be much more fortunately
circumstanced than one which can only
move in a straight line. For, in a plane, there is a
possibility of an infinite variety of
shapes, and the being we have supposed could come
into contact with an indefinite number
of other beings. He would not be limited, as in
the case of the creature in a straight
line, to one only on each side of him.
It is obvious that it would be possible
to play curious tricks with a being confined to a
plane. If, for instance, we suppose such
a being to be inside a square, the only way out
that he could conceive would be through
one of the sides of the square. If the sides
were impenetrable, he would be a fast
prisoner, and would have no way out.
What his case would be we may understand, if
we reflect what a similar case would be
in our own existence. The creature is
shut in in all the directions he knows of. If a man
is shut in in all the directions he knows
of, he must be surrounded by four walls, a roof
and a floor. A two-dimensional being inside
a square would be exactly in the same
predicament that a man would be, if he
were in a room with no opening on any side.
Now it would be possible to us to take
up such a being from the inside of the square,
and to set him down outside it. A being
to whom this had happened would find himself
outside the place he had been confined
in, and he would not have passed through any
of the boundaries by which he was shut
in. The astonishment of such a being can only
be imagined by comparing it to that which
a man would feel, if he were suddenly to find
himself outside a room in which he had
been, without having passed through the
window, doors, chimney or any opening
in the walls, ceiling or floor.
Another curious thing that could be effected
with a two-dimensional being, is the
following. Conceive two beings at a great
distance from one another on a plane
surface. If the plane surface is bent
so that they are brought close to one another, they
would have no conception of their proximity,
because to each the only possible
movements would seem to be movements in
the surface. The two beings might be
conceived as so placed, by a proper bending
of the plane, that they should be
absolutely in juxtaposition, and yet to
all the reasoning faculties of either of them a great
distance could be proved to intervene.
The bending might be carried so far as to make
one being suddenly appear in the plane
by the side of the other. If these beings were
ignorant of the existence of a third dimension,
this result would be as marvellous to
them, as it would be for a human being
who was at a great distance--it might be at the
other side of the world--to suddenly appear
and really be by our side, and during the
whole time he not to have left the place
in which he was.
What The Fourth Dimension Can Not Stand For
The only thing the Fourth Dimension will not allow is punks that think
they are in a cult like the 85th element. They look at the cult like the
Fourth Dimension and since they didn't get in they think they can form
another cult. All these kids are a bunch of
who have no life but to copy our cult to try to be cool. You stupid punks
get a real life stop copying the FOURTH DIMENSION we will crush you.
Quotes
"Beyond the three dimensions of Euclid we have added another, the fourth
dimension, which is
to say the figuration of space, the measure of infinite." --Albert
Gleizes"
The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education."-Albert
Einstein
"Education is what remains after one has forgotten everything he learned
You Have Entered 
The Fourth Dimension
View
Our Guestbook
Page made
by Re Hierarchy